People who own all-electric cars where coal generates the power may think they are helping the environment.

電動(dòng)汽車的用電來自燃煤發(fā)電廠，使用電動(dòng)汽車的人可能認(rèn)為他們保護(hù)了環(huán)境。

But a new study finds their vehicles actually make the air dirtier, worsening global warming.

但是一項(xiàng)新的研究表明，電動(dòng)汽車實(shí)際上對(duì)空氣污染更不利，且會(huì)加劇全球變暖。

The controversial study raises major questions over the future of 'green' cars.

這項(xiàng)頗受爭(zhēng)議的研究提出了有關(guān)“環(huán)保”車未來的一些問題。

'Unfortunately, when a wire is connected to an electric vehicle at one end and a coal-fired power plant at the other end, the environmental consequences are worse than driving a normal gasoline-powered car,' said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who wasn't part of the study but praised it.

卡耐基科學(xué)研究所（Carnegie Institution for Science）研究員肯·卡代拉（Ken Caldeira）說：“不幸的是，當(dāng)一根線把電動(dòng)車和一個(gè)燃煤發(fā)電廠連在一起時(shí)，造成的環(huán)境污染比普通的汽油車更嚴(yán)重。” 肯·卡代拉并未參與這項(xiàng)研究，但是對(duì)該研究表示贊賞。

Driving vehicles that use electricity from renewable energy instead of gasoline could reduce the resulting deaths due to air pollution by 70 percent, it concluded.

該研究指出，駕駛可再生能源發(fā)電的電動(dòng)車來取代汽油車，可以使因空氣污染造成的死亡率下降70%。

Ethanol isn't so green, either, the researchers claimed.

研究員表示，乙醇也不是那么環(huán)保。

'It's kind of hard to beat gasoline' for public and environmental health, said study co-author Julian Marshall, an engineering professor at the University of Minnesota.

研究報(bào)告撰寫者之一朱利安·馬歇爾（Julian Marshall）表示，出于民眾健康和環(huán)保的考慮，“想要取代汽油很有難度”。朱利安是明尼蘇達(dá)大學(xué)（University of Minnesota）的工程學(xué)教授。

'A lot of the technologies that we think of as being clean ... are not better than gasoline.'

“很多我們認(rèn)為清潔的技術(shù)……其實(shí)都比汽油好不到哪里。”

The key is the source of the electricity all-electric cars need.

關(guān)鍵取決于電動(dòng)汽車用電的來源。

If it comes from coal, the electric cars produce 3.6 times more soot and smog deaths than gas, because of the pollution made in generating the electricity, according to the study that is published Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

周一發(fā)表在《美國國家科學(xué)院院刊》的這項(xiàng)研究指出，如果電來自煤，那么使用電動(dòng)車產(chǎn)生的煤煙和煙霧造成的死亡是汽油車的3.6倍，因?yàn)槿济喊l(fā)電過程產(chǎn)生了污染。

They also are significantly worse at heat-trapping carbon dioxide that worsens global warming, it found.

同時(shí)該研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，由煤產(chǎn)電排放的溫室氣體二氧化碳更加劇了全球變暖。

The study examines environmental costs for cars' entire life cycle, including where power comes from and the environmental effects of building batteries.

調(diào)查研究了一輛車使用周期過程中付出的環(huán)境代價(jià)，包括能源從哪里來，制造電池又造成了多少環(huán)境影響。

But if the power supply comes from natural gas, the all-electric car produces half as many air pollution health problems as gas-powered cars do.

但是如果電力來自天然氣，電動(dòng)車產(chǎn)生的空氣污染造成的健康問題將會(huì)汽油車的一半。

And if the power comes from wind, water or wave energy, it produces about one-quarter of the air pollution deaths.

如果能源來自風(fēng)、水或者潮汐能，空氣污染造成的健康問題將是原來的四分之一。

Hybrids and diesel engines are cleaner than gas, causing fewer air pollution deaths and spewing less heat-trapping gas.

混合動(dòng)力和柴油發(fā)電機(jī)要比汽油清潔，造成的死亡人數(shù)更少，溫室氣體的排放也更少。

But ethanol isn't, with 80 percent more air pollution mortality, according to the study.

但根據(jù)研究，乙醇不屬于此類，造成的空氣污染的致死人數(shù)要高出80%。

（翻譯：小霹靂 編輯：Julie）