<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Time to break free of protectionist shackles

          By Mei Xinyu (China Daily) Updated: 2016-05-25 07:45

          Time to break free of protectionist shackles

          An employee welds the exterior of a vehicle along a production line at a factory in Qingdao, Shandong province. [Photo/Agencies]

          The overwhelming-majority vote in the European Parliament recently against granting China market economy status was not made on a reasonable basis and doing so will not bring benefits to the European Union.

          Whether or not to give China the market economy status treatment is not an issue concerning whether China has met market economic standards unilaterally set by the EU, but an issue concerning whether the EU honors its commitment or not.

          According to the accession articles China signed on entry to the World Trade Organization 15 years ago, China should be automatically granted market economy status in December this year. Such an article is unconditional and means that WTO members should abandon the surrogate country approach used in the past for anti-dumping investigations against China. Any investigation should instead be based on product prices or production costs in China itself.

          Aside from the long-term negative effects produced by the protectionist effort to avoid industrial competition, the European Parliament's refusal to grant China market economy treatment will not have favorable short-term effects on the bloc's industrial development. In a passed resolution, the European Parliament pointed out that 56 of the anti-dumping measures the EU is taking are targeted at imports from China, covering both traditional labor-intensive manufacturing and such capital and technology-intensive manufacturing as steel products. It is exactly such an announcement that has made protectionists in the EU lobby for not granting China market economy status so that they can say "no" to "made in China" brands as a means of job protection.

          Some in the EU should know that while exporting products to the rest of the world, China is also the world's leading market for imports and its growth in imports is among the fastest of world's major economies either in trade in goods or in trade in services. China's import volume denominated in the US dollar suffered a 14.1 percent decline year-on-year in 2015, bigger than the 13.4 percent decline in the import volume of the EU, but this was mainly a result of the drastic drop in prices of the primary commodities China heavily imports. China's imports of manufactured goods from the United States and European countries still enjoy huge potential for growth.

          Following the European Parliament's recommendation will do no good to the struggling EU economy, given that encouraging trade protectionism will do nothing but worsen the EU's industrial environment. There were some countries in the past that did succeed in realizing the development of some infant industries through protectionist industrial policies. However, what the European Parliament's resolution tried to protect is not high-tech pioneering sectors, but such traditional sectors as steel that have already experienced their golden period and now enjoy no development potential. Interest groups dominating these out-of-date and weakly-founded industries do not focus their attention on how to raise their efficiency, but instead think how to maintain previous protectionist measures to lengthen their survival. Such attempts offer no hope for the future of EU industry and on the contrary add to its cost burden. What the EU should do is to inject new vitality into its economy.

          The protectionism of interest groups has shackled the EU's economic vitality. It is exactly trade protectionism that has put the eurozone economy at a disadvantageous position in its competition with other developed economies, and caused the continuous decline of its economic proportion in the world's total GDP. Of the EU members, the countries advocating liberal trade such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, support granting China market economy status and they have also achieved a better economic performance than the eurozone as a whole. France, Italy and Spain who are opposed to granting China market economy status, however, have performed worse than the eurozone's average performance

          Europe should know that the development and buildup of interest groups, a byproduct of a country or region's economic prosperity, will suffocate the vigor of its innovation and continuous growth, and only by smashing the shackles imposed by these groups can it achieve sustainable development.

          The author is a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce's International Trade and Economic Cooperation Institute.

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 人妻少妇精品无码专区二区| 2019亚洲午夜无码天堂| a级毛片毛片免费观看久潮| 成人免费视频一区二区三区| 在线观看成人年视频免费| 亚洲欧美啪啪视屏| 国产极品精品自在线不卡| 亚洲色欲在线播放一区二区三区| 天天在线看无码AV片| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久| 国产成人欧美综合在线影院| 国产av熟女一区二区三区| 成在线人永久免费视频播放| 看免费的无码区特aa毛片| 国产360激情盗摄全集| 无码无遮挡刺激喷水视频| 国产午夜福利在线视频| 亚洲婷婷五月综合狠狠爱| 熟女女同亚洲女同中文字幕| 亚洲欧美另类久久久精品播放的| 激情文学一区二区国产区| 毛片久久网站小视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品av| 欧美黑人添添高潮a片www| 在线观看国产久青草| 日韩在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲成人资源在线观看| 成人精品自拍视频免费看| 中文精品无码中文字幕无码专区| 最新系列国产专区|亚洲国产| 国产成人午夜福利院| 国产一区二区精品高清在线观看 | 国产99re热这里只有精品| 天堂а√在线中文在线| 自偷自拍亚洲综合精品| 中文字幕无码av不卡一区| 亚洲综合无码明星蕉在线视频| 琪琪777午夜理论片在线观看播放| 国产午夜亚洲精品国产成人| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠米奇777| 中国熟妇毛多多裸交视频|