<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:41

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system-people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品久久杨幂国产杨幂| 久久99精品久久久大学生| 乱码中文字幕| 丝袜美腿亚洲综合第一区| 日韩无专区精品中文字幕| 精品人妻中文字幕在线| 在国产线视频A在线视频| 国内精品视频一区二区三区| 97se亚洲综合在线天天| 亚洲一区二区三区四区| 激情 自拍 另类 亚洲| 亚州av第二区国产精品| 亚洲精品视频免费| 午夜福利日本一区二区无码| 亚洲第一区二区三区av| 日韩有码中文字幕国产| 伊人色综合久久天天小片| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠ds005| AV最新高清无码专区| 青青草原国产精品啪啪视频| 国产精品一区二区久久毛片| 久久AV中文综合一区二区| 91久久夜色精品国产网站| 国产成人99亚洲综合精品| 日本区二区三区不卡视频| 人妻丝袜AV中文系列先锋影音| 国产成AV人片久青草影院 | 把女人弄爽大黄A大片片| 老司机性色福利精品视频| 人妻熟女一区二区aⅴ千叶宁真| 老司机精品一区在线视频| 亚洲亚洲人成综合网络| 成在线人永久免费视频播放| 国产成人亚洲精品青草天美| 国产亚洲精品一区二区无| 亚洲日韩久久综合中文字幕| 精品偷拍被偷拍在线观看 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区| 成在线人永久免费视频播放| 久久99精品久久久久麻豆| 最近中文字幕完整国语|