<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          WORLD> Top News
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2009-09-02 04:52

          WASHINGTON: Google Inc's plan to digitize millions of books would violate German copyright law and the country's privacy protections for Internet users, the German government said in a US court filing.

          Germany opposes a proposed settlement, which Google reached with the Authors Guild and Association of American Publishers Inc among others in October 2008, because Google could digitize books by German authors without their consent, according to filing dated Monday.

          It was signed by Johannes Christian Wichard, deputy director general of the Directorate Commercial and Economic Law, in Germany's Justice Ministry.

          Wichard said the deal would allow Google to "flout German laws that have been established to protect German authors and publishers, including with respect to digital copying, publishing and the dissemination of their works."

          "The decision of this court with respect to this settlement will have the dramatic and long-range effect of creating a new worldwide copyright regime without any input from those who will be greatly impacted -- German authors, publishers and digital libraries and German citizens," he said, noting that German authors not published in the United States were not represented by the Authors Guild.

          Under the settlement, authors have until the end of this week to tell Google that they do not want their books digitized. A hearing on approval of the settlement is set for Oct 7 in Manhattan federal court.

          Critics have said the deal would allow Google -- and only Google -- to digitize so-called orphan works, which could pose an antitrust concern. Orphan works are books or other materials that are still covered by US copyright law, but it is not clear who owns the rights to them.

          Wichard also noted clashes between Google's plans and German requirements that Internet users' privacy be ensured.

          Related readings:
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google dials into Apple's territory
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google launches rare ad campaign to sell more apps
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google to smash Windows monopoly
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google trial in Italy: freedom v. responsibility

          "By failing to ensure similar or adequate privacy protections, the settlement violates well-established national and international privacy laws," Wichard wrote.

          The digitizing deal has divided the tech, publishing and antitrust worlds.

          Google's rivals Microsoft Corp and Yahoo Inc oppose the deal while the American Library Association and Association of Research Libraries asked for court oversight. They fear the deal gives Google the unimpeded ability to set prices for libraries, once they scan books and put them on the Internet. If the service becomes a necessity for libraries they would face monopoly pricing, Google's opponents say.

          The US Justice Department is investigating the deal while European Union antitrust enforcers, prompted by Germany, have said they would study it.

          In Brussels, the European Union's media commissioner, Viviane Reding, welcomed Google's initiative. "It is good to see that new business models are evolving which could allow bringing more content to an increasing number of consumers," Reding said in a statement last week.

          The proposed settlement would settle a lawsuit filed in 2005 by the Authors Guild. The Guild and a group of publishers had alleged copyright infringement.

          Google has agreed to pay $125 million to create a Book Rights Registry, where authors and publishers can register works and receive compensation.

          The case is Authors Guild et al v Google Inc 05-08136 in US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品一区二区区别| 亚洲国产成人久久综合一区| 亚洲av熟女国产一二三| 国产精品伦人视频免费看| 日韩一区二区三区av在线| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇高清| 日本久久一区二区三区高清| 神马视频| 痉挛高潮喷水av无码免费| 国产伦视频一区二区三区| 日本高清在线观看WWW色| 亚洲电影天堂在线国语对白| 在线无码免费的毛片视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国码久在线| 午夜性又黄又爽免费看尤物| 日韩精品一区二区三区激情视频| 风韵丰满熟妇啪啪区老老熟妇| 亚洲国产综合精品2020| 无码人妻av免费一区二区三区| 久久亚洲人成网站| 中文字幕日韩国产精品| 国产精品第一页中文字幕| 一区二区三区一级黄色片| 亚洲国产日韩一区三区| 亚洲国产成熟视频在线多多| 国产精品一区亚洲一区天堂| 97精品尹人久久大香线蕉| 57pao国产成视频免费播放| 日本黄页网站免费观看| 99中文字幕国产精品| 亚洲av中文乱码一区二| 成人午夜大片免费看爽爽爽| 推油少妇久久99久久99久久| 久久精品久久电影免费理论片| 九九热视频在线免费观看| 高清激情文学亚洲一区| 日韩av在线不卡免费| 影音先锋人妻av中文字幕久久| 在线日韩一区二区| 久久国内精品一国内精品| 九九热精品在线视频观看|