<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Liu Shinan  
           





           
          Hassle over defective cell phone
          [ 2007-08-22 14:42 ]

          I bought a Motorola mobile phone last week. A few days later I found the sound of the phone was odd, like that of a radio not tuned properly. I went back to the shop and asked for a replacement, backed with the "three warranties policy", which says that the customer can return a commodity if it is defective within seven days after purchase or ask for a replacement within 15 days.

          The salesgirl made a few calls with the phone and told me the sound was all right. I was not surprised by her answer but insisted I be given a new phone. Realizing that she had met a tenacious customer, the salesgirl said she could replace it provided I proved that the defect was "not the consequence of improper use".

          I was angered by the answer. How could one do anything to a mobile phone to cause sound distortion? A problem with the sound quality can only be caused by a malfunction of the audio-frequency magnifier in the machine. Obviously the defect could not have been caused by my "improper use". What's more, there was no sign of physical damage to the phone.

          But she insisted: "I'm sorry, sir, it's our rule. Look at these warranty terms on the back of the invoice where you signed your name." Yes, I signed under the terms which state that any request for a refund or replacement should be accompanied by a certificate from the producer's service center.

          I had no alternative but call at Motorola's service center. There were a dozen or so customers waiting there. About 15 minutes later, it was my turn. A service woman tried my phone and told me it needs to be tested. The phone was then taken to a backroom.

          After another 25 minutes, my phone was brought back. The service woman admitted that the defect was caused by a glitch inside the phone. She signed a certificate and told me to go back to the shop to get a new one.

          At the shop they gave me a new phone "just taken from the warehouse". I asked for more units to choose from but was told it was the only one they had in stock. Responding to my doubts, they swore they were telling the truth. "Or you can come a few days later when more phones arrive from the plant," they said.

          I knew I had to accept what I was given, because I could not afford to waste more time on the matter.

          Though no fault of mine, I had to spend so much time and energy to enforce my rights as a consumer. In other words, I paid for Motorola's mistake. Should the company compensate me for the time, energy and money (travel fare) I had spent? It should, but I doubt it, nor would any other manufacturer in a similar case.

          My wife said: "Be content with what you have attained. They've done their best to replace the substandard phone with a new one."

          She may be right. Manufacturers today provide a much better after-sale service than in previous years. Consumers should feel content with the progress. But I still find I was unjustly treated. In the final analysis I had paid the cost for a company to make good a defective product. The final price I paid had been raised in fact.

          To be honest, I would not go to Motorola asking for compensation. Most other consumers would not either, for they know the time and energy they spend would far exceed the compensation they may get.

          However, something should be done to counter this unfairness. It was due to some customers' fight for compensation years ago that led to today's "three warranties policy" and the law on protection of consumers' rights.

          Our legislature and government should take a fresh look at the warranties to make it more amenable to consumers.


          Email: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn


                          

                                            (China Daily 08/22/2007 page10)

           

           

          About the author:
           

          劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業于武漢華中師范學院(現華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業于北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

           
           
          相關文章 Related Stories
           
                   
           
           
           
           
           
                   

           

           

           
           

          48小時內最熱門

               
            癡情的祈禱:My prayer
            Click《人生遙控器》(精講之八)
            《這個殺手不太冷》主題曲:Shape of my heart
            樣樣精通,樣樣稀松?
            “剩飯”怎么說

          本頻道最新推薦

               
            Cold turkey: Can you dig it?
            是故意“不顧”還是“顧不上”?
            Been there, seen that
            中文店招英譯絕非易事
            A definition of sorts

          論壇熱貼

               
            怎么翻譯“你冤枉我”?
            “不服” 怎么翻譯
            how to say “舉手之勞”
            參加BBC在線競賽 獲免費倫敦游機會!
            Penny for your thoughts?
            怎么翻譯‘公益廣告'






          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕人妻精品在线| 在线视频中文字幕二区| 一区二区三区午夜无码视频| 好好热好好热日韩精品| 激情内射人妻一区二区| 狠狠色综合久久狠狠色综合 | 精品国产综合一区二区三区 | 九九热视频精选在线播放| 久久国产成人亚洲精品影院老金| 国产精品成人99一区无码| 欧美成人黄在线观看| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看成人| 亚洲中文久久久精品无码| 久在线视频播放免费视频| 国产一区二区不卡91| 一本色道国产在线观看二区| 中文字幕乱码一区二区三区免费| 无码人妻斩一区二区三区| 九九热免费公开视频在线| 日本亚洲一级中文字幕| 激情久久av一区二区三区| 青草99在线免费观看| 亚洲精品一二三中文字幕| 2019久久久高清日本道| 亚洲永久一区二区三区在线| 午夜a福利| 亚洲国产精品久久久天堂麻豆宅男| 亚洲AV小说在线观看| 91一区二区三区蜜桃臀| 福利视频在线一区二区| 国产精品久久精品| 在线精品视频一区二区三四| 亚洲成在人线av| 帅男chinesegay飞机| 国产乱码精品一区二区三| 亚洲午夜性猛春交XXXX| 搡老熟女老女人一区二区| 制服丝袜美腿一区二区| 欧美 亚洲 另类 丝袜 自拍 动漫 久久久久久久久毛片精品 | 秋霞AV鲁丝片一区二区| 亚洲自拍另类|