<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Liu Shinan  
           





           
          Hassle over defective cell phone
          [ 2007-08-22 14:42 ]

          I bought a Motorola mobile phone last week. A few days later I found the sound of the phone was odd, like that of a radio not tuned properly. I went back to the shop and asked for a replacement, backed with the "three warranties policy", which says that the customer can return a commodity if it is defective within seven days after purchase or ask for a replacement within 15 days.

          The salesgirl made a few calls with the phone and told me the sound was all right. I was not surprised by her answer but insisted I be given a new phone. Realizing that she had met a tenacious customer, the salesgirl said she could replace it provided I proved that the defect was "not the consequence of improper use".

          I was angered by the answer. How could one do anything to a mobile phone to cause sound distortion? A problem with the sound quality can only be caused by a malfunction of the audio-frequency magnifier in the machine. Obviously the defect could not have been caused by my "improper use". What's more, there was no sign of physical damage to the phone.

          But she insisted: "I'm sorry, sir, it's our rule. Look at these warranty terms on the back of the invoice where you signed your name." Yes, I signed under the terms which state that any request for a refund or replacement should be accompanied by a certificate from the producer's service center.

          I had no alternative but call at Motorola's service center. There were a dozen or so customers waiting there. About 15 minutes later, it was my turn. A service woman tried my phone and told me it needs to be tested. The phone was then taken to a backroom.

          After another 25 minutes, my phone was brought back. The service woman admitted that the defect was caused by a glitch inside the phone. She signed a certificate and told me to go back to the shop to get a new one.

          At the shop they gave me a new phone "just taken from the warehouse". I asked for more units to choose from but was told it was the only one they had in stock. Responding to my doubts, they swore they were telling the truth. "Or you can come a few days later when more phones arrive from the plant," they said.

          I knew I had to accept what I was given, because I could not afford to waste more time on the matter.

          Though no fault of mine, I had to spend so much time and energy to enforce my rights as a consumer. In other words, I paid for Motorola's mistake. Should the company compensate me for the time, energy and money (travel fare) I had spent? It should, but I doubt it, nor would any other manufacturer in a similar case.

          My wife said: "Be content with what you have attained. They've done their best to replace the substandard phone with a new one."

          She may be right. Manufacturers today provide a much better after-sale service than in previous years. Consumers should feel content with the progress. But I still find I was unjustly treated. In the final analysis I had paid the cost for a company to make good a defective product. The final price I paid had been raised in fact.

          To be honest, I would not go to Motorola asking for compensation. Most other consumers would not either, for they know the time and energy they spend would far exceed the compensation they may get.

          However, something should be done to counter this unfairness. It was due to some customers' fight for compensation years ago that led to today's "three warranties policy" and the law on protection of consumers' rights.

          Our legislature and government should take a fresh look at the warranties to make it more amenable to consumers.


          Email: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn


                          

                                            (China Daily 08/22/2007 page10)

           

           

          About the author:
           

          劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業于武漢華中師范學院(現華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業于北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

           
           
          相關文章 Related Stories
           
                   
           
           
           
           
           
                   

           

           

           
           

          48小時內最熱門

               
            癡情的祈禱:My prayer
            Click《人生遙控器》(精講之八)
            《這個殺手不太冷》主題曲:Shape of my heart
            樣樣精通,樣樣稀松?
            “剩飯”怎么說

          本頻道最新推薦

               
            Cold turkey: Can you dig it?
            是故意“不顧”還是“顧不上”?
            Been there, seen that
            中文店招英譯絕非易事
            A definition of sorts

          論壇熱貼

               
            怎么翻譯“你冤枉我”?
            “不服” 怎么翻譯
            how to say “舉手之勞”
            參加BBC在線競賽 獲免費倫敦游機會!
            Penny for your thoughts?
            怎么翻譯‘公益廣告'






          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲一区二区三区久久综合| 卡一卡2卡3卡精品网站| 午夜无遮挡男女啪啪免费软件| 女人与牲口性恔配视频免费| 国产香蕉尹人在线视频你懂的| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁2022| 国产精品自拍啪啪视频| 国产精品女同性一区二区| 人人超碰人摸人爱| 精品乱子伦一区二区三区| 在线中文字幕国产一区| 亚洲国产成人久久精品软件| 天堂mv在线mv免费mv香蕉 | 蜜芽久久人人超碰爱香蕉| 人妻中文字幕精品一页| 国产av永久无码天堂影院| 国产成人a在线观看视频| 亚洲精选av一区二区| 亚洲欧美自偷自拍视频图片| 五月天天天综合精品无码| 亚洲一区二区三区av链接| 国产午夜三级一区二区三| 午夜无码区在线观看亚洲| 欧美人与动牲交A免费观看| 久久国内精品自在自线91| 亚洲国产精久久久久久久春色| 电视剧在线观看| 国产成人AV国语在线观看| 国产蜜臀视频一区二区三区| 在线播放深夜精品三级| 亚洲精品揄拍自拍首页一| 亚洲精品中文字幕第一页| 成人福利国产午夜AV免费不卡在线 | 久久亚洲精少妇毛片午夜无码| 欧美变态另类z0z0禽交| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区一本二本| 亚洲国产精品500在线观看| 深夜国产成人福利在线观看| 国产成人精品一区二区三区免费| 无码人妻aⅴ一区二区三区蜜桃| 最新国内精品自在自线视频|